What next for central bank policy?

Central banks, keen to reestablish their inflation-fighting credentials, will be determined and keep going down the deflation route, deploying hawkish rhetoric along with big rate hikes. But as recession looms, that may become a tough line to stick to. 

In trying to turn around economies for over a decade, central banks aimed for inflation that was close to or below target. A wide range of policy tools were brought to bear, at enormous scale but arguably with very little effect. Despite deploying zero or negative policy rates in many countries and creating trillion-dollar balance sheets, central banks found it was extremely difficult to bring inflation back to target.

With central banks raising rates in the face of record levels of inflation (Chart 3&4), it would be unwise to underestimate how much might be needed to bring inflation back to target. Cyclical factors will probably help stem the tide of inflation in coming months, but structural factors will also play a part and these could turn out to be much more sticky.

Central bank policy making has always been subject to change over time. The last Federal Reserve (Fed) rate hiking cycle, which really began in 2016, was overseen by Janet Yellen. Policymaking was forward-looking, preemptive and generally model-based. Rates were raised well before inflation got back to target. And, in fact, it only just got above target in that period (Chart 5).

The ‘Yellen years’ were very different to the world of today. In 2020, the Fed changed its language on inflation in quite an important way, where they emphasized managing average inflation over time. This allows policymakers more flexibility in that inflation can be allowed to modestly and temporarily run above target, or vice versa.

But policy making seems to have changed in a more fundamental way too. Today’s Fed seems more focused on current inflation prints than has been the case historically and therefore is much more reactive than preemptive. It is also less clear what rules or models are informing decision making. A lot has changed, and that includes policymaking.

Source: US Fed Funds Rate: US Federal Reserve. Core PCE: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, as at August 2019

Global debt levels are now around 350% to global GDP; relative debt levels have generally been increasing over the last twenty years, as have absolute debt levels (Chart 6). For some commentators, the argument was that this didn't matter. Why? Because financing costs were generally falling around the world. Central banks were cutting rates, real rates fell and debt service was therefore getting easier, even at higher absolute levels.

But if both real rates and nominal rates are increasing, will these high debt levels start to matter? We think so. Debt servicing is likely to get harder, not only for companies, but also for governments. And it is a fact of life, when debt levels are high, tolerating higher levels of inflation can become a more attractive policy choice.

Source: Institute of International Finance, 1 November 2022

The themes that we have touched on here are global in nature, and will unfold at different rates in different countries. The policy choices made in Europe are likely to be quite different from the policy choices made by the US in the coming years. And that is going to mean different risks and different returns for those markets. That will be particularly true if central banks are forced to either increase rates much higher than anyone is currently anticipating, or equally if they retreat from the hawkish rhetoric and decide to tolerate higher levels of inflation for longer. In this environment, we believe strategies that are flexible and able to exploit those different opportunities are likely to be the most successful.